Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Systematic review of prognostic factors for work participation in patients with sciatica
  1. Teddy Oosterhuis1,
  2. Veerle R Smaardijk1,
  3. P Paul FM Kuijer1,
  4. Miranda W Langendam2,
  5. Monique H W Frings-Dresen1,
  6. Jan L Hoving1
  1. 1 Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Teddy Oosterhuis, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam 1100 DD, The Netherlands; t.oosterhuis{at}amsterdamumc.nl

Abstract

Sciatica impacts on the ability to work and may lead to a reduced return to work. This study reviewed and summarised prognostic factors of work participation in patients who received conservative or surgical treatment for clinically diagnosed sciatica. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO until January 2018. Cohort studies, using a measure of work participation as outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers performed study inclusion and used the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool for risk of bias assessment and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Based on seven studies describing six cohorts (n=1408 patients) that assessed 21 potential prognostic factors, favourable factors for return to work (follow-up ranging from 3 months to 10 years) included younger age, better general health, less low back pain or sciatica bothersomeness, better physical function, negative straight leg raise-test, physician expecting surgery to be beneficial, better pain coping, less depression and mental stress, less fear of movement and low physical work load. Study results could not be pooled. Using GRADE, the quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low, with downgrading mainly for a high risk of bias and imprecision. Several prognostic factors like pain, disability and psychological factors were identified and reviewed, and these could be targeted using additional interventions to optimise return to work. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016042497.

  • epidemiology
  • musculoskeletal

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Drafting the manuscript: TO, PK and JLH; revising the manuscript for content: TO, VRS, PK, MWL, MHWFD and JLH; study concept and design: TO, PK and JLH; data collection: TO, VRS, PK, MWL and JLH; analysis or interpretation of data: TO, PK, MWL and JLH.

  • Funding The study was funded by the Dutch Employee Insurance Agency (UWV).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.