HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kriebel, D. Articles by Pearce, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kriebel, D. Articles by Pearce, N. Topic Collections OEM Education Editor's choice

Exposure and dose modelling in occupational epidemiology

¹ Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
² Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA and International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
³ Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University Wellington Campus, Wellington, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D Kriebel
Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA; David_Kriebel{at}uml.edu

Complex and dynamic physiologic processes underlie the exposure-response relations that occupational and environmental epidemiologists study. Simple summary measures of exposure such as the average, cumulative exposure, or duration of exposure, can be applied suitably in exposure-response analyses in many instances. However, there are situations where these metrics may not be directly proportional to risk, in which case their use will result in misclassification and biased estimates of exposure-response associations. We outline methods for developing exposure or dose metrics which may reduce misclassification, as illustrated with some recent examples. Selecting better exposure or dose metrics can be thought of as a problem of choosing appropriate weights on the exposure history of each cohort member. Dosimetric modeling involves choosing exposure weights based on formal hypotheses about underlying physiologic or pathogenetic processes. Dosimetric modeling is still not widely used in epidemiology, and so the forms of mathematical models and the criteria for choosing one model over another are not yet standardized. We hope to stimulate further applications through this presentation.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Kriebel Reanalysis: lessons great and small Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2008; 65(6): 368 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Loomis Work in brief Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2007; 64(7): 429 - 429. [Full Text] [PDF]