HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: oem.2006.029322v1 64/7/454    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, L. S Articles by Forst, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Friedman, L. S Articles by Forst, L. Topic Collections Related Article

The impact of OSHA recordkeeping regulation changes on occupational injury and illness trends in the US: a time-series analysis

University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr L S Friedman
University of Illinois at Chicago, 2121W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; lfriedman{at}tspri.org

Objectives: The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), based on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) logs, indicates that the number of occupational injuries and illnesses in the US has steadily declined by 35.8% between 1992–2003. However, major changes to the OSHA recordkeeping standard occurred in 1995 and 2001. The authors assessed the relation between changes in OSHA recordkeeping regulations and the trend in occupational injuries and illnesses.

Methods: SOII data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for years 1992–2003 were collected. The authors assessed time series data using join-point regression models.

Results: Before the first major recordkeeping change in 1995, injuries and illnesses declined annually by 0.5%. In the period 1995–2000 the slope declined by 3.1% annually (95% CI –3.7% to –2.5%), followed by another more precipitous decline occurring in 2001–2003 (–8.3%; 95% CI –10.0% to –6.6%). When stratifying the data, the authors continued to observe significant changes occurring in 1995 and 2001.

Conclusions: The substantial declines in the number of injuries and illnesses correspond directly with changes in OSHA recordkeeping rules. Changes in employment, productivity, OSHA enforcement activity and sampling error do not explain the large decline. Based on the baseline slope (join-point regression analysis, 1992–4), the authors expected a decline of 407 964 injuries and illnesses during the period of follow-up if no intervention occurred; they actually observed a decline of 2.4 million injuries and illnesses of which 2 million or 83% of the decline can be attributed to the change in the OSHA recordkeeping rules.

Abbreviations: BLS, Bureau of Labor Statistics; NEISS, National Electronic Injury Surveillance System; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; SOII, Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

Related Article

Are work-related conditions less common or were their definitions changed?

K D Rosenman
Occup. Environ. Med. 2007 64: 429-430. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K D Rosenman Are work-related conditions less common or were their definitions changed? Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2007; 64(7): 429 - 430. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Loomis Work in brief Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2007; 64(7): 429 - 429. [Full Text] [PDF]