Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, N
Right arrow Articles by Schröer, C A P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, N
Right arrow Articles by Schröer, C A P
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60:i71
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

Fatigue as a predictor of sickness absence: results from the Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work

N Janssen1, IJ Kant2, G M H Swaen2, P P M Janssen1, C A P Schröer3

1 Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
2 Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
3 Department of Medical Sociology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mrs Janssen, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands;
n.janssen{at}beoz.unimaas.nl

Objectives: To investigate whether there is a relationship between fatigue and sickness absence. Two additional hypotheses were based on the theoretical distinction between involuntary, health related absence and voluntary, attitudinal absence. In the literature, the former term is usually used to describe long term sickness absence, the latter relates to short term sickness absence. In line with this, the first additional hypothesis was that higher fatigue would correspond with a higher risk of long term, primarily health related absence. The second additional hypothesis was that higher fatigue would correspond with a higher risk of short term, primarily motivational absence.

Methods: A multidimensional fatigue measure, as well as potential sociodemographic and work related confounders were assessed in the baseline questionnaire of the Maastricht cohort study on fatigue at work. Sickness absence was objectively assessed on the basis of organisational absence records and measured over the six months immediately following the baseline questionnaire. In the first, general hypothesis the effect of fatigue on time-to-onset of first sickness absence spell during follow up was investigated. For this purpose, a survival analysis was performed. The effect of fatigue on long term sickness absence was tested by a logistic regression analysis. The effect of fatigue on short term sickness absence was investigated by performing a survival analysis with time-to-onset of first short absence spell as an outcome.

Results: It was found that higher fatigue decreased the time-to-onset of the first sickness absence spell. Additional analyses showed that fatigue was related to long term as well as to short term sickness absence. The effect of fatigue on the first mentioned outcome was stronger than the effect on the latter outcome. Potential confounders only weakened the effect of fatigue on long term absence.

Conclusions: Fatigue was associated with short term but particularly with long term sickness absence. The relation between fatigue and future sickness absence holds when controlling for work related and sociodemographic confounders. Fatigue as measured with the Checklist Individual Strength can be used as a screening instrument to assess the likelihood of sickness absence in the short term.


Keywords: fatigue; sickness absence; prospective studies

Abbreviations: CIS, Checklist Individual Strength; MCS, Maastricht cohort study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
P. Lindberg, E. Vingard, M. Josephson, and L. Alfredsson
Retaining the ability to work--associated factors at work
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 16(5): 470 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
S F A Duijts, I J Kant, J A Landeweerd, and G M H Swaen
Prediction of sickness absence: development of a screening instrument
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2006; 63(8): 564 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P Lindberg, M Josephson, L Alfredsson, and E Vingard
Promoting excellent work ability and preventing poor work ability: the same determinants? Results from the Swedish HAKuL study
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2006; 63(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. J H Huibers, I J. Kant, J A. Knottnerus, G. Bleijenberg, G. M H Swaen, and S. V Kasl
Development of the chronic fatigue syndrome in severely fatigued employees: predictors of outcome in the Maastricht cohort study
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2004; 58(10): 877 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M J H Huibers, I. Kant, G M H Swaen, and S V Kasl
Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome-like caseness in the working population: results from the Maastricht cohort study
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2004; 61(5): 464 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. J. H. Huibers, A. J. H. M. Beurskens, C. P. van Schayck, E. Bazelmans, J. F. M. Metsemakers, J A. Knottnerus, and G. Bleijenberg
Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy by general practitioners for unexplained fatigue among employees: Randomised controlled trial
The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 184(3): 240 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
F J H van Dijk and G M H Swaen
Fatigue at work
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2003; 60 (2008): i1 - i2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.