Occup Environ Med

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, R
Right arrow Articles by Checkoway, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, R
Right arrow Articles by Checkoway, H
Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002;59:36-43
© 2002 Occupational and Environmental Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Exposure to crystalline silica, silicosis, and lung disease other than cancer in diatomaceous earth industry workers: a quantitative risk assessment

R Park1, F Rice1, L Stayner1, R Smith1, S Gilbert1, H Checkoway2

1 US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-15, Cincinnati, OH 45226–1998, USA
2 University of Washington, Department of Environmental Health, Seattle, Washington 98195–7234, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
R Park, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-15, Cincinnati, OH 45226–1998, USA;
rhp9{at}cdc.gov

Objectives: To estimate excess lifetime risk of (a) mortality from lung disease other than cancer (LDOC), and, (b) onset of radiographic silicosis, arising from occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica dust.

Methods: Data from a cohort of California diatomaceous earth mining and processing workers exposed to crystalline silica dust (mainly as cristobalite) were reanalyzed with Poisson regression methods with internal and external adjustments for potential confounding by calendar time, age, smoking, Hispanic ethnicity, and time since first observation. Model fit was evaluated by comparing deviances and fitting cubic spline models. Lifetime risks of death from LDOC and radiographic silicosis were estimated up to age 85 with an actuarial approach accounting for competing causes of death.

Results: For deaths due to LDOC, a linear relative rate model gave the best fit in Poisson regression analyses. At the mean cumulative exposure of LDOC cases to silica, after adjustment for smoking, the estimated rate ratio was 4.2 (p<0.0001); at the maximum cumulative exposure of cases, the rate ratio was 18.4. The excess lifetime risk for white men exposed to respirable cristobalite dust for 45 years at the current permissible exposure limit (PEL; about 0.05 mg/m3) of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration was 54/1000 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 17 to 150). For 70 incident cases of radiographic silicosis largely manifest before the end of employment, the best fit was also the linear relative rate model, predicting a rate ratio of 25.6 for silicosis at the mean cumulative exposure of the cases (p<0.0001). The excess lifetime risk for silicosis at the current PEL was 75/1000.

Conclusion: Current occupational health standards for crystalline silica permit risks of lung disease other than cancer far in excess of what is usually considered acceptable by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (a lifetime risk of less than one in a thousand deaths).


Keywords: cristobalite; excess lifetime risk; risk assessment

Abbreviations: LDOC, lung disease other than cancer; PEL, permissible exposure limit; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; REL, recommended exposure level; ILO, International Labour Organisation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L A Tse, I T S Yu, C C Leung, W Tam, and T W Wong
Mortality from non-malignant respiratory diseases among people with silicosis in Hong Kong: exposure-response analyses for exposure to silica dust
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2007; 64(2): 87 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Steenland
Silica: deja vu all over again?
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2005; 62(7): 430 - 432.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A 't Mannetje, K Steenland, M Attfield, P Boffetta, H Checkoway, N DeKlerk, and R-S Koskela
Exposure-response analysis and risk assessment for silica and silicosis mortality in a pooled analysis of six cohorts
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2002; 59(11): 723 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.